Comparison Between Pan Granulation and Drum Granulation
I. Key Differences Summary
Comparison Dimension |
Pan Granulation |
Drum Granulation |
Applicable Scale |
Small-to-medium enterprises, pilot production (1-8 tons/hour) |
Large-scale industrial production (3-20 tons/hour) |
Particle Characteristics |
Near-spherical, high roundness, smooth surface |
Elliptical or irregular, rough surface |
Particle Size Range |
2-6mm (high precision) |
3-10mm (wider distribution) |
Energy Consumption |
8-12 kW·h/ton (lower) |
15-25 kW·h/ton (higher) |
Maintenance Cost |
Low (fewer wear parts) |
High (rapid wear of drum and baffles) |
II. Pan Granulation: Preferred for Precision Production
- Ideal Scenarios
- Small-scale operations: Low investment cost and compact footprint make it suitable for family farms, township cooperatives, and pilot plants.
- High-quality particle production: Spherical particles with uniform size are ideal for premium products like flower-specific fertilizers and seedling substrate fertilizers.
- Moderately sticky materials: Effective for processed livestock manure, sludge, and other materials with moderate viscosity, requiring minimal binders.
- Limitations
- Limited capacity: Daily output of tens of tons, unsuitable for mass production.
- Humidity sensitivity: Requires raw material moisture content of 25%-35%. Excessive moisture causes sticking, while insufficient moisture hinders granulation.
- Dust control challenges: Difficulty in collecting dust and fumes during operation, necessitating additional environmental measures.
III. Drum Granulation: A Powerhouse for Large-Scale Industrialization
- Ideal Scenarios
- Mass production: Daily output exceeding 100 tons, achievable through parallel operation of multiple units for ultra-large-scale needs.
- Complex formulations and special materials: Handles poorly flowing materials like phosphate rock powder and potassium salts, or formulations with high binder/conditioner content.
- Cost-effective production: Produces high-strength particles (crushing strength ≥20N) suitable for agricultural field fertilizers and soil conditioners where appearance is less critical.
- Limitations
- Large equipment footprint: Requires 5-10m length and ample installation space.
- High upfront investment: plus the need for a hot-air drying system (particle moisture must be reduced to <15%).
- Higher recycle rate: While granulation efficiency reaches 70%, some recycled material requires reprocessing.
IV. Selection Guide: Match Equipment to Your Needs
- By Production Scale
- <1.5 tons/hour: Prioritize pan granulation for cost-effectiveness and flexibility.
- >5 tons/hour: Opt for drum granulation for higher efficiency in continuous mass production.
- By Raw Material Characteristics
- High-moisture materials (>30%): Consider paddle granulation (eliminates drying steps), or drum granulation if spherical particles are required.
- Dry materials (<20%): Extrusion granulation avoids water addition but produces cylindrical particles requiring additional processing.
- Moderately sticky materials: Pan granulation achieves high granulation rates; drum granulation may require binders.