Large-Scale Fertilizer Equipment Manufacturer

  • Home
  • /
  • QUESTIONS
  • /
  • Comparison Between Pan Granulation and Drum Granulation

Comparison Between Pan Granulation and Drum Granulation

Comparison Between Pan Granulation and Drum Granulation

I. Key Differences Summary

Comparison Dimension Pan Granulation Drum Granulation
Applicable Scale Small-to-medium enterprises, pilot production (1-8 tons/hour) Large-scale industrial production (3-20 tons/hour)
Particle Characteristics Near-spherical, high roundness, smooth surface Elliptical or irregular, rough surface
Particle Size Range 2-6mm (high precision) 3-10mm (wider distribution)
Energy Consumption 8-12 kW·h/ton (lower) 15-25 kW·h/ton (higher)
Maintenance Cost Low (fewer wear parts) High (rapid wear of drum and baffles)

II. Pan Granulation: Preferred for Precision Production

  1. Ideal Scenarios
    • Small-scale operations: Low investment cost and compact footprint make it suitable for family farms, township cooperatives, and pilot plants.
    • High-quality particle production: Spherical particles with uniform size are ideal for premium products like flower-specific fertilizers and seedling substrate fertilizers.
    • Moderately sticky materials: Effective for processed livestock manure, sludge, and other materials with moderate viscosity, requiring minimal binders.
  2. Limitations
    • Limited capacity: Daily output of tens of tons, unsuitable for mass production.
    • Humidity sensitivity: Requires raw material moisture content of 25%-35%. Excessive moisture causes sticking, while insufficient moisture hinders granulation.
    • Dust control challenges: Difficulty in collecting dust and fumes during operation, necessitating additional environmental measures.

III. Drum Granulation: A Powerhouse for Large-Scale Industrialization

  1. Ideal Scenarios
    • Mass production: Daily output exceeding 100 tons, achievable through parallel operation of multiple units for ultra-large-scale needs.
    • Complex formulations and special materials: Handles poorly flowing materials like phosphate rock powder and potassium salts, or formulations with high binder/conditioner content.
    • Cost-effective production: Produces high-strength particles (crushing strength ≥20N) suitable for agricultural field fertilizers and soil conditioners where appearance is less critical.
  2. Limitations
    • Large equipment footprint: Requires 5-10m length and ample installation space.
    • High upfront investment: plus the need for a hot-air drying system (particle moisture must be reduced to <15%).
    • Higher recycle rate: While granulation efficiency reaches 70%, some recycled material requires reprocessing.

IV. Selection Guide: Match Equipment to Your Needs

  1. By Production Scale
    • <1.5 tons/hour: Prioritize pan granulation for cost-effectiveness and flexibility.
    • >5 tons/hour: Opt for drum granulation for higher efficiency in continuous mass production.
  2. By Raw Material Characteristics
    • High-moisture materials (>30%): Consider paddle granulation (eliminates drying steps), or drum granulation if spherical particles are required.
    • Dry materials (<20%): Extrusion granulation avoids water addition but produces cylindrical particles requiring additional processing.
    • Moderately sticky materials: Pan granulation achieves high granulation rates; drum granulation may require binders.

Quick Contact

Wulong Industrial Cluster, Zhengzhou, China
+8615303836406
+86-15303836406