Large-Scale Fertilizer Equipment Manufacturer

  • Home
  • /
  • QUESTIONS
  • /
  • Comparative Analysis of Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) and Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU)

Comparative Analysis of Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) and Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU)

Comparative Analysis of Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) and Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU)

1. Composition and Manufacturing Process

  • Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU):
    • Coating Material: Primarily sulfur, supplemented with microcrystalline wax and attapulgite regulators.
    • Process: Molten sulfur is spray-coated onto urea particles to form a triple-layer structure (base sulfur layer, sealing layer, and regulatory layer).
    • Characteristics: Simple process, low cost, but potential for sudden membrane rupture.
  • Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU):
    • Coating Material: Polyurethane as the carrier, applied via thermal compression wrapping.
    • Process: Urea particles are uniformly coated under high temperature to form a smooth, even membrane.
    • Characteristics: Moisture-resistant, heat-resistant, and aging-resistant; non-polluting after degradation.

2. Performance Comparison

 

Performance Indicator Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU)
Release Period 60–90 days (membrane thickness-dependent) 60–90 days (precisely controlled)
Release Rate Higher initial release; potential sudden release in later stages Slow, steady release synchronized with crop demand
Moisture Resistance Poor (prone to failure in high humidity) Excellent (stable in humid environments)
Nitrogen Volatilization Resistance Weak Strong (reduces nitrogen loss)
Soil Adaptability Effective in alkaline soils; poor in acidic soils Wide soil compatibility, especially acidic soils
Environmental Impact Sulfur may accelerate soil acidification; minimal membrane residue Non-polluting post-degradation; improves soil structure

3. Application Performance

  • Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU):
    • Advantageous Crops: Corn, rice (yield increase of 9.7–12.4% in Northeast China’s black soil).
    • Limitations: Sulfur benefits reduced by 37% in acidic soils; release curve misaligned with crop demand.
  • Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU):
    • Advantageous Crops: Corn, wheat (full-season fertilizer efficiency >70%).
    • Advantages: Prevents excessive early growth; avoids late-stage nutrient deficiency; enhances lodging resistance; suitable for mechanized fertilization.

4. SWOT Analysis

 

Dimension Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU)
Strengths Low cost; supplements sulfur; remediates saline-alkali soils Precise release; eco-friendly; versatile soil adaptability
Weaknesses Uneven release; poor performance in acidic soils; sudden membrane rupture Higher cost; complex manufacturing process
Market Status Declining share (11% in 2023) Dominant technology; growing market share

5. Environmental Impact

  • SCU: Sulfur may exacerbate soil acidification; minimal membrane residue.
  • PCU: Non-toxic degradation products; enhances soil water retention and permeability.

6. Recommended Use Cases

  • SCU: Alkaline/saline-alkali soils; cost-sensitive field crops (e.g., Northeast China corn).
  • PCU: Acidic soils; high-efficiency agriculture; crops requiring precise nutrient control (e.g., vegetables, fruits).

Conclusion: Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU) excels in release precision, environmental sustainability, and adaptability, aligning with modern agricultural demands. Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) remains viable for cost-driven applications and saline-alkali soil remediation.

Quick Contact

Wulong Industrial Cluster, Zhengzhou, China
+8615303836406
+86-15303836406