1. Composition and Manufacturing Process
- Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU):
- Coating Material: Primarily sulfur, supplemented with microcrystalline wax and attapulgite regulators.
- Process: Molten sulfur is spray-coated onto urea particles to form a triple-layer structure (base sulfur layer, sealing layer, and regulatory layer).
- Characteristics: Simple process, low cost, but potential for sudden membrane rupture.
- Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU):
- Coating Material: Polyurethane as the carrier, applied via thermal compression wrapping.
- Process: Urea particles are uniformly coated under high temperature to form a smooth, even membrane.
- Characteristics: Moisture-resistant, heat-resistant, and aging-resistant; non-polluting after degradation.
2. Performance Comparison
Performance Indicator |
Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) |
Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU) |
Release Period |
60–90 days (membrane thickness-dependent) |
60–90 days (precisely controlled) |
Release Rate |
Higher initial release; potential sudden release in later stages |
Slow, steady release synchronized with crop demand |
Moisture Resistance |
Poor (prone to failure in high humidity) |
Excellent (stable in humid environments) |
Nitrogen Volatilization Resistance |
Weak |
Strong (reduces nitrogen loss) |
Soil Adaptability |
Effective in alkaline soils; poor in acidic soils |
Wide soil compatibility, especially acidic soils |
Environmental Impact |
Sulfur may accelerate soil acidification; minimal membrane residue |
Non-polluting post-degradation; improves soil structure |
3. Application Performance
- Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU):
- Advantageous Crops: Corn, rice (yield increase of 9.7–12.4% in Northeast China’s black soil).
- Limitations: Sulfur benefits reduced by 37% in acidic soils; release curve misaligned with crop demand.
- Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU):
- Advantageous Crops: Corn, wheat (full-season fertilizer efficiency >70%).
- Advantages: Prevents excessive early growth; avoids late-stage nutrient deficiency; enhances lodging resistance; suitable for mechanized fertilization.
4. SWOT Analysis
Dimension |
Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) |
Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU) |
Strengths |
Low cost; supplements sulfur; remediates saline-alkali soils |
Precise release; eco-friendly; versatile soil adaptability |
Weaknesses |
Uneven release; poor performance in acidic soils; sudden membrane rupture |
Higher cost; complex manufacturing process |
Market Status |
Declining share (11% in 2023) |
Dominant technology; growing market share |
5. Environmental Impact
- SCU: Sulfur may exacerbate soil acidification; minimal membrane residue.
- PCU: Non-toxic degradation products; enhances soil water retention and permeability.
6. Recommended Use Cases
- SCU: Alkaline/saline-alkali soils; cost-sensitive field crops (e.g., Northeast China corn).
- PCU: Acidic soils; high-efficiency agriculture; crops requiring precise nutrient control (e.g., vegetables, fruits).
Conclusion: Polyurethane Coated Urea (PCU) excels in release precision, environmental sustainability, and adaptability, aligning with modern agricultural demands. Sulfur Coated Urea (SCU) remains viable for cost-driven applications and saline-alkali soil remediation.